Who in Iran is worried about Biden returning to Barjam?
Concerns about Biden’s return to Borjam can be seen inside Iran as well as outside Iran.
The recent US presidential election was important not only for the American people but also for many countries. Numerous governments on all continents have been waiting to see what the outcome of this election will be, and which of the two candidates, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, will go to the White House. Not only was Israel no exception to this rule, but it waited longer than anyone else for the outcome of America’s most sensational election. The reason was the supportive measures that Trump had given to the Israeli regime for 4 years. Measures such as recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, moving the US embassy to the city, and legalizing Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank, although provoked much worldwide protest against Donald Trump’s actions, made him very popular at first sight. He became the Minister of Israel. Netanyahu tweeted a photo of himself with Trump.
In addition to all this, Trump’s departure from Burjam was very much to Tel Aviv’s liking. The economic war waged by the White House with extensive sanctions against Iran was Israel’s dream, which was now being interpreted.
In addition to Israel, Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies, who have backed the Trump administration’s campaign of maximum pressure on the Iranian government, have openly expressed their satisfaction with the US decision in 2018 to abandon the nuclear deal, an international document.
But their happy life was only three years. Biden’s bid for the White House and his announcement in the US election campaign that he would return to Burjam caused the sweetened palate of Israel and Saudi Arabia to soon become bitter. Biden has made it clear that his goal is to return to Borjam, but he will only do so if Iran first fulfills all of its obligations under the agreement.
Tehran will take a step back, given that Iranian officials have explicitly stated that Washington will take any step to lift sanctions. It is because of these statements that Jerusalem warns that the return of the United States to the previous terms of the nuclear deal with Iran under Joe Biden might lead to a crisis in relations between the two countries.
Israel warns Biden to return to Obama plan
The return of Zionist officials’ concerns is so great that a few days ago, Israeli television reported on the issue and said that Tel Aviv warns that the return of the United States to the previous terms of the nuclear deal with Iran in the administration of President Joe Biden may lead the two countries to crisis. Draw relationships. “If Biden implements Obama’s plan, we will have nothing to do with him,” the report quoted a senior government official as saying.
According to the Times of Israel, however, Israeli security and defense officials have warned Netanyahu against openly militant approach to the White House’s future plans in order to keep the door to hope open in interaction with the Biden administration, and instead have suggested that Israeli consultations. With the White House to put more pressure on Iran using the lever of sanctions, behind closed doors.
But concerns about Biden’s return to Borjam can be seen inside Iran as well as outside Iran. Opponents of the Borjam nuclear deal, all of whom are sharp critics of the Rouhani government, claimed after the Borjam deal that the nuclear industry had been shut down and cement had been poured into the pipes of the enrichment facility because of Borjam. According to these people, Borjam was of no benefit to Iran and was only a privilege for the West. Of course, when Trump left Borjam and called for a new agreement with Tehran to secure US interests in the document, he said, opponents of the Rouhani administration did not respond to whether Borjam ultimately benefited Iran or not. If not, how could Trump, at the cost of discrediting the United States, illegally withdraw from a Security Council resolution and, as a result, be left alone in a bid to confront Iran at the United Nations? After Tehran’s five steps in developing its enrichment activities in response to the US withdrawal from Borjam, should it use the trigger mechanism embedded in Borjam against Iran?
Domestic extremists worry about Biden’s possible return to Burjam
However, this group of domestic extremists are still worried about Biden returning to Burjam after Trump leaves the White House. In this regard, they approved a plan in the parliament, according to which the government was obliged to start 20% enrichment. Also, in case of refusal of the relevant authorities from its implementation, imprisonment is considered. Eventually, the government officially began 20 percent enrichment in the short-lived deadline set by the 11th Majlis law, sparking a flood of international backlash against Tehran. Of course, this time too, the same opponents of the government who used to say, “Iran’s nuclear industry has been shut down and we gave everything for Borjam and left!” They also had no answer to their claim that if the Rouhani government had lost all of Iran’s nuclear capabilities with Borjam, then how could it have resumed 20 percent enrichment at its nuclear facilities in less than a month.
This, along with some other statements and actions, happened while Biden was more likely to return to Burjam than ever before. Even now, the people who are the main option for Biden’s foreign policy team are further reinforcing the speculation that Biden will return to the Burjam that Obama signed in 2015. Therefore, it is quite understandable that Israel and Saudi Arabia are worried about the return of the United States to the UN Security Council and its respect for an international document, but why there should be such concern for the country’s extremist current is a question. The importance of this question is doubled when we recall that the presidential election in Iran, which will be held in 1400, is very close, and in a few months Hassan Rouhani will have to hand over the government to the next president after 8 years.
According to numerous international experiences, the probability of important negotiations between countries in such situations is greatly reduced because countries prefer to negotiate with the head of state who is not in the last months of his life. So, naturally, all of Barjam’s opponents, both inside and outside the country, should be so concerned in the months leading up to the 1400 elections, but the reality is that this is not the case and their concerns are more than can be imagined. In this regard, the movements of Israel and some Arab countries to consult with the new US administration have increased sharply, but to minimize the possibility of Biden returning to Burjam.
Concerns about the people introduced by Biden
To address this amount of concern, several points can be made, including that Biden’s foreign policy team is “full of people who have been involved in negotiations with Iran.” For example, Blinken is Biden’s choice to run the State Department. “If Iran returns to fulfilling its obligations, then we will do the same,” he said, adding that “Borjam is a platform for further negotiations.”
The election of Robert Mali as Biden’s special envoy to Iran is another case in point that has led to strong criticism from anti-Iranian extremists. Biden’s foreign policy adviser Matt Das also wrote in response to the criticism: “If you want to know how great Rob Rob is, look at his critics. “Peter Bainart, a prominent American journalist, also tweeted: ‘Many people who opposed Burjam and thought maximum pressure was a great strategy are now worried, because Bob Mali might be able to save Burjam.’
These are the most important reasons why foreign extremists’ concern about Biden’s possible increase in Borjam’s signature can be substantiated. But the root of the concern of domestic hardliners and critics of the Rouhani government should be sought in the 1400 elections. For the past three years, critics of the government have sought to portray Trump’s sanctions and economic war as having little or no effect on the country’s economic woes. Since Trump’s departure from the UN Security Council, which has sparked a wave of hope among the people to solve some of the economic woes, they have hoped to help a section of society that voted for Rouhani in 1992 and 1996. Disappointed with their votes. Even now, they hope that the return of Iran and the United States to the Borjam-related talks will not happen in the last months of the Rouhani administration, in order to perhaps increase the chances of their candidate to win the 1400 elections.